"विकिपीडियासम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः च प्रशासकाः" इत्यस्य संस्करणे भेदः

::With all due respect Vaibhav, can I ask what forced you to say: "you really seem to know not much about titles used in hinduism articles"? And by this statement, do I understand that sa.wp is a secular wiki, where only Hinduism articles should stay? And regarding "Btw, u created 281, and i 453, that also manually, however very small (but not as ur articles), take it as a advice, ''no one praises one liners and in fact they r rarely of any use''," I don't know why exactly do we have the {{tl|stub}} template. Oh yes, I just remembered, its because users can create "one liners" and expand them when they grab more info. We all know that sa.wp is suffering from an admin backlog, and my contribution to the whole Wikipedia community speaks for itself. Regarding "Publishisng an articl on wn is not big thing, my two articles were also published, one remained popular till many days, and one was the breaking news." I guess you are not the determiner of what contribution on what wiki is of what value, its your own '''personal''' opinion and reflects your utter disregard for the community as a whole. On a personal note, if my request fails, I will be strong enough to digest, unlike you who keeps himself displayed as an admin at sa.wp (misinforming and misguiding users) with your flags on many wikis. And yeah, you're here from IDK when, and have created only 453 articles. I'm already past your half-way mark, and that too in two days. I'll echo your words and say: "'''take it just as a friendly advice'''", and remove the incorrect flags you display on many wikis. Addendum: One, please do answer all my queries to ''justify'' you oppose vote; and two, if you think my stubs "are of no use", go ahead, challenge their notability and put 'em up for deletion, then, we'll see what happens (BTW... I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop). I'm curious about the two-face you carry, first, he says articles published on en.wn are "not a big thing", challenging the very notability of the community, and then, [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages%2FWikinews_Hindi&action=historysubmit&diff=2592142&oldid=2228333 supports] the creation of a new wn (hi.wn). You said: "As of article creation, i don't want to speak that, but i can create more articles than you in one day (and of '''better quality''')". OK mate, the [self-declared and self-accepted] challenge is on. And you claim: "no one praises one liners and in fact they r rarely of any use. maybe u r a newbie so u will take time to know that, but one liners '''are of no use'''." So you mean that we should be distributing adminship to people only focused on creating articles eventually making it to "प्रमुख लेख"? Oh he's got x featured articles on his belt, lets give him adminship... is that what you're trying to say. If yes, let me remind you that it is ''just a criteria'' we use to determine the work and willingness of a user. You also claim that I should get more knowledge of admin related work [and I'm utterly disgraced on being marked a newbie; yeah, you just undermined ALL the work I've done for the community] see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Avenue_X_at_Cicero/CSD_log this], [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/afdstats.cgi?name=Avenue+X+at+Cicero&max=&startdate=&altname= this] and [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/usersearch.cgi?name=Avenue+X+at+Cicero&page=Wikipedia%3ARequests+for+page+protection&max=500 this]. I'm sure it'll prove I've got enough, if not immense, "knowledge of of admin related work." Addendum: One, please do answer all my queries to ''justify'' you oppose vote; and two, if you think my stubs "are of no use", go ahead, challenge their notability and put 'em up for deletion, then, we'll see what happens (BTW... I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop). Regards, [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|चर्चा]]) २०:१६, २२ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)