"विकिपीडियासम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः च प्रशासकाः" इत्यस्य संस्करणे भेदः
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose: re |
|||
पङ्क्तिः ११८:
Again, it might look a comment on a GR request, u have no experience on small wikis, many people disagree with me on this, but for me, for Adminship on sa wiki, or even wikis like hi wiki, people should have experience of working in small wikis, however due to this idea of mine, some people also called me a vandal, however that is a different thing. So i think my oppose is justified now.
: I'm afraid not. Your oppose ain't as justified as you think it is. First up, can I know who set these criteria? I checked up the page and found out it is a ''proposed'' policy [''recommended'' criteria, rather], so please don't quote points and vote on the basis of the proposed policy [I say it should be removed from the page and transferred somewhere else with immediate effect, because content on that page reflects the view of the community not a user, particularly you]. As far as the rollback thing is concerned, that is moot now, and does not affect my editing at sa.wp. Also, we know that sa.wp desperately needs an active admin with the admin backlog still present, and I fit the bill perfectly. Yes, I ''may'' have had supported your adminship [which was strongly rejected; and yes, leastwise I was strong enough to remove the rollback icons even though the issue is only moot, so I don't think I will have a person not strong enough to handle rejection to question my "maturity"] if you had not taken the really bad decisions you did and showed regard for WikiPolicies [not ''proposed'' ones] particularly [[:en:WP:HONORIFIC|HONORIFIC]] and [[:en:WP:COMMONNAME|COMMON NAME]]. Given your last point, I completely disagree with your "small wiki" point [trust me, no wiki is small, they just might be less known or less read, but that doesn't mean experienced users with SULs knowing the language thoroughly should be disregarded and said to have carried no experience]. Even if I do agree your [hypothetical] small wiki, this'll mean that en.wp is a big/large wiki, and since I carry enough experience there (and also, many policies between the two wikis are common), that does justify that I'll be as knowledgeable, especially as an admin, in this grave time of backlog. If you're challenging the stubs, and are saying that one liners are not useful at all, do start a discussion, and we'll see. As I said, I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop as sysops [or even former one's for the matter of the fact] should have a certain knowledge of WikiPolicies, which you don't seem to. And, your oppose '''[still]''' ain't as justified as you think it is. [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|चर्चा]]) ११:२७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
====Nuetral====
| |||