"विकिपीडियासम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः च प्रशासकाः" इत्यस्य संस्करणे भेदः
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose: re |
|||
पङ्क्तिः १२०:
: I'm afraid not. Your oppose ain't as justified as you think it is. First up, can I know who set these criteria? I checked up the page and found out it is a ''proposed'' policy [''recommended'' criteria, rather], so please don't quote points and vote on the basis of the proposed policy [I say it should be removed from the page and transferred somewhere else with immediate effect, because content on that page reflects the view of the community not a user, particularly you]. As far as the rollback thing is concerned, that is moot now, and does not affect my editing at sa.wp. Also, we know that sa.wp desperately needs an active admin with the admin backlog still present, and I fit the bill perfectly. Yes, I ''may'' have had supported your adminship [which was strongly rejected; and yes, leastwise I was strong enough to remove the rollback icons even though the issue is only moot, so I don't think I will have a person not strong enough to handle rejection to question my "maturity"] if you had not taken the really bad decisions you did and showed regard for WikiPolicies [not ''proposed'' ones] particularly [[:en:WP:HONORIFIC|HONORIFIC]] and [[:en:WP:COMMONNAME|COMMON NAME]]. Given your last point, I completely disagree with your "small wiki" point [trust me, no wiki is small, they just might be less known or less read, but that doesn't mean experienced users with SULs knowing the language thoroughly should be disregarded and said to have carried no experience]. Even if I do agree your [hypothetical] small wiki, this'll mean that en.wp is a big/large wiki, and since I carry enough experience there (and also, many policies between the two wikis are common), that does justify that I'll be as knowledgeable, especially as an admin, in this grave time of backlog. If you're challenging the stubs, and are saying that one liners are not useful at all, do start a discussion, and we'll see. As I said, I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop as sysops [or even former one's for the matter of the fact] should have a certain knowledge of WikiPolicies, which you don't seem to. And, your oppose '''[still]''' ain't as justified as you think it is. [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|चर्चा]]) ११:२७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
::For me, it is, its my vote, so its my wish what requirements i want to set, others may have other expectations. And please keep ur views on small wikis with urself, even stewards use this term, then one day u will point them. To clarify at last, a '''strong OPPOSE''' is what is vote on this RfA. [[User:Vibhijain|<span style="color:#B57EDC">♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛</span>]] [[User talk:Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:red"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]] [[विशेष:विपत्रयोजक/Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:blue"><small>Email</small></span></sup>]] ११:५७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
::And i think i have got more knowledge of policies than u, if u had got them, i don't think en wiki admins would had to reject ur request for rollback due to misuse. [[User:Vibhijain|<span style="color:#B57EDC">♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛</span>]] [[User talk:Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:red"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]] [[विशेष:विपत्रयोजक/Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:blue"><small>Email</small></span></sup>]] ११:५९, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
::: Yeah...so you mean that you vote based on your own reasoning, which are far from logical [considering they were, you would have completely proved your point], I assert. Who started with views on "small" wikis, may I ask? And yes, Mr. Know it All [at least you claim to, as far as policies are concerned], you may ''think'' that you have "more knowledge of policies than u", but if you did... maybe you would have become a permanent admin. You don't know the policies thoroughly, considering you did, Mike and Mayur would see no reason to "Strongly OPPOSE" you quest for permanent adminship. You even claimed that Mayur brought in disputes from hi.wp even though half the people agree he didn't. Understanding and taking correct decisions [as an admin] are your Achilles' heel, or so I have been forced to infer. [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|चर्चा]]) १२:२२, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)<br />Addendum: Do remember to indent what you say next time. [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|चर्चा]]) १२:२२, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
====Nuetral====
| |||