"विकिपीडिया:विचारसभा" इत्यस्य संस्करणे भेदः

पङ्क्तिः ७७५:
I still have doubt in using such compulsion, because even English wiki sometimes gives link to article which has merely tangential mention of the news. Suppose the news is related to space-walk by an astronaut from a spacecraft Y, then any experienced contributor can add this news to main page but to make an article of spacecraft Y, to such a detail that related spacewalks are also mentioned, will certainly require a technically aware writer. English wiki, having large reach, always has enough writers who are sufficiently exposed to any given topic. But here if we impose such policy, some of important news will never enter into the news section because of lack of a qualified article-writer.
That said, having an article on each current affair topic is always a welcome improvement. I think we can make this as a guideline but not a compulsory rule. '''Let us start it as a lax rule and then if successful we can make it compulsory''' (i.e. having at least one article which gives a reference to the news). Perhaps we can provide reference to one-liner news on the Sanskrit wikinews page (exists as सद्यः कालीन सम्भवाः on this wiki, and is unused nowadays)-[[User:Hemant wikikosh|Hemant wikikosh]] ([[User talk:Hemant wikikosh|चर्चा]]) १३:०१, ७ नवम्बर् २०११ (UTC).
:I don't mind not having an article. Its the news source I'm worried about. We should not post anything without having a clear news source. How about this: If it is possible to create an article, then the news reference should go there. If creating the article is complex, then the news source should compulsorily be posted on the talk page of the News template, in order for anyone else to verify the material. '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Rao</span><span style="color:#00BFFF">7</span>]] •[[User talk:MikeLynch|<sup><span style="color:green"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]]''' १३:२३, ७ नवम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
"https://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/विकिपीडिया:विचारसभा" इत्यस्माद् प्रतिप्राप्तम्