In Wikipedia World most horrible thing is VANDALISM. Someone comes and edits in articles or creates new articles. It is very bad to manage all such things. But I am saying with faith and experience that, since last two years Nehal Dave is watching out नूतनपरिवर्तनानि so no one could have done vandalism.
Second thing is he is creating good articles. In his articles you all can see most of things. Like –
Audio of Articles
I have seen that his articles are very informative and Grammatical correct. I have seen his भारतेश्वरः पृथ्वीराजः Article and he also made फलकम्:चौहानवंशावली too. I have notice that his all articles have two extra templates. तलं गच्छतु and शिखरं गच्छतु. Those are very good for big articles. His all articles are models for other sa.wikipedia editors.
Third thing is that, Nehal Dave has exclusively added many new features in sa.wikipedia. In that some examples are very important for us.
Fourth thing is very minor but very important. In Sanskrit Wikipedia there are so many articles which have wrong name. So it is very difficult to search and to create new articles. That problem is removed by Nehal to create शुद्धाशुद्धम् Template. Now also he manages that category. And his Sandbox is very good. He is putting articles in main stream after prepare whole article in sandbox. Which is most inspiring thing.
Fifth thing is he categorized Stubs in well meaner. Before there was confusion to understand how many stubs are there, but now we can see stubs easily. If someone wants to edit respective category’s articles, than it will be so easy. All-rounder Nehal Dave will manage sa.wikipedia tremendously. I strongly support him. प्रतिमा (चर्चा) १७:०६, १३ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
समर्थनम्---When i work with @NehalDaveND: in sa.wiktionary by AWB tool, i feel that he is to be the sysop in sa. wiki. --Info-farmer (My SUL) (चर्चा) ०३:५२, १४ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
समर्थनम् – I don't know Sanskrit very well but I can understand it well. I progressive edits by Nehal. He should get these rights, so it will be helpful for other sysops too.☆★संजीव कुमार: (✉✉) ०६:२१, १५ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
अपि च, मम विकिनिष्क्रियताकारणात् एतन्मतं गणनीयं वा अगणनीयं वा इति समुदायस्य विवेकाधीनः वर्तते । परन्तु एतद्विषये "एवं मम मतम्" इत्यत्र मेऽभिप्रायः । -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १७:११, १६ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
समर्थनम्--- Few months ago I started editing in sa wiki (on request of Nehal Dev of course), and from that time so far I have found him ever ready and very dedicated not just in working to devalope sa wiki, but also in encouraging and helping others to do the same. Many people like me want to work and help but are shy or don't know how to or how to be effective, for these kind of people he'll be a very helpful admin. And his Sanskrit in very fine and comprehensive too.Muddassir Ahmad १५:०३, १८ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
I think NehalDaveND is doing good work. I can see his contributions in sa.wikipedia, translatewiki, meta, commons etc. In this voting I stay neutral because if some wants to oppose him for this admin right, than S/he must have good and batter reason to oppose. I am reminding all that Wikipedia is not a democracy If more oppose vote will be here than also it may not countable. Because if some editor doing batter work in Wikipedia so without any reason other members can’t stop him or oppose him.
So my humble request to all sa.wikipedia editors is please don’t create any unusual oppose. If your point will be proper, than NehalDaveND must have reason for that and after his reasoning if all community members are not satisfy than oppose will be positive. I have seen that some users are coming for only voting. After that they go to sleep. That is not fare. One user is spending his all the day behind sa.wikipedia and some inactive user comes and oppose him without any reason or useless reason. NehalDaveND is the most active user in sa.wikipedia and I am also very active since two years in sa.wikipedia. I am seeing that his work is very good and all editors are happy with his work. So I am neutral to support all sa.wikipeidans. Please do reasonable voting. Thank you. Udit Sharma (चर्चा) १५:१६, १३ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
YDone. I see User:Udit Sharma's point, and I must say that the opinion of all Community members are valid. The opinions of established members have been given more consideration. MikeLynch (चर्चा) १७:५१, २० दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
समर्थनम् -I am volunteering in Sa. Wikipedia for the last 4 years +. It is my considered opinion that Sri. Sayant Mahato, currently in Bangalore, would be well suited for the post of Administrator. He is well versed in Sanskrit (M. Phil and now pursuing Ph.D) and also a polyglot and has special interest in ancient Manuscripts Particularly speaking he is quite competent in computer operations and equally adept in the field of Wikipedia and has attended/conducted many Wiki. outreach programmes. He would be an able administrator for. sa. Wikipedia. --Narayanan V T (चर्चा) ०८:०६, १५ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
समर्थनम्-- I have known Sayant very closely as a sa wiki contributor since 2012. He has been very dedicated, humble and studious. While imparting training and guidance, I have found him as quite a fast learner and follower willing to adapt various technical and editing aspects of Mediawiki. I have always been impressed with his deep knowledge in orthography of the Indic languages as well as in Sanskrit. Viswaprabha (चर्चा) ११:५८, १५ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)