विकिपीडियासम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः च प्रशासकाः/पुरालेखः २

Active discussions

Me for Admin!!सम्पाद्यताम्

Hello... I want to become an admin on Sanskrit Wikipedia.

About me and my experience:
Age: about 17

10 years experience in computer programming. I know HTML, CSS, PHP and C, C++, Liberty Basic, FreeBasic, JustBasic, etc.

I was highly active for 2 years on microwiki- http://microwiki.org.uk and http://micronations.wikia.com

I also formed my own wiki and I was it's successful admin for 4 months, then I deleted that wiki as I made it just for experience and it contained personal info about me. I am an expert of Wiki markup.

Hindi is my native language. I'm excellent speaker of Sudh Hindi as I'm from RSS background. This automatically make much of my Sanskrit vocabulary for at least nouns.

My Sanskrit is ok... And I'm still mastering it... Hope to do soon.. My organisation is 'Aryavart Swatantrata Sangh' with 300 members. We and some of our sister organisations(much larger) are planning to launch Sanskrit revival project- "Each one Teach Three", the details of this project are secret so it would be given to public after 3rd november. Such projects can become successful only only with the help of internet. So, I want to make it the fort of Sanskrit revival.

I have experience of administrating a forum for about 3 years. For 3 years I successfully lead a forum- http://jbforums.conforums.com

We would make a Sanskrit wikipedia forum where we can discuses more efficiently and hence build Sanskrit Wikipedia better. As as our Sanskrit revivalist project would be launched, many and many people would come to wikipedia and forum... Some would be the super experts of the Sanskrit... Hence our community would grow.

Currently my edits are less in this wikipedia as I have created many large pages... like सभ्यता, सुभाषचंद्रबॊसः, युद्धम्, etc.... But I have huge experience in IT field... You all would choose me :)

If I'm made an admin, I would turn Sanskrit wikipedia a highly active wiki in 4-5 months...

Pages who's current good form is only because of me:-

  1. सभ्यता
  2. सुभाषचन्‍द्रबोसः
  3. युद्धम्
  4. तत्त्वम्_(रसायनशास्त्रम्)
  5. वैदिकविज्ञानम्
  6. लॊज़बानम्
  7. दत्तोपंतठेंगड़ीः

These are my main articles...

Also संस्कृतम् page was correct by me.... There were severe mistakes in use of wiki markup....

--हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) ०३:१८, २२ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

Any replies?? :P --हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) १९:०७, २३ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

Hello??? Any discussion??? Anything in support or oppose???? Is there any admin here????

Anybody?? Please notice this message of mine :) --हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) ०४:२७, २४ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)


Though, I know I can't vote for myself.... But However, I started this section....

--हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) ०४:२७, २४ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)


  • Sorry, bit I am till not clear if you need the admin tools, if you can tell why you need them, I can change my opinion. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १६:३३, २५ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

I need it as I have mentioned above- I have large experience of management and technical work so I can manage this wiki excellently. And the people who would come by our 'Each one Teach Tree' project would find more comfortable in asking the troubles from me. I hope now your vote might change, :). --हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) ११:२८, २६ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

Thanks for the response, but admin tools are generally given to fight vandalism, since they can be highly dangerous even used in good faith, i can't support this RfA till you can tell what type of technical works you look forward to do. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ०५:२८, २८ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

प्रचालक नामनिर्देशन Sysop Nominationसम्पाद्यताम्

As you know South Asian Lanuage Wikipedias are growing fast.To support translation requirements of south asian language Wikipedias we need parellel growth in Sanskrit language Wikipedia, Wictionary,wikisourse also.

Herewith we invite nominations for adminships of sa.wikipedia.org.We are looking for aleast two more admins/sysops to support wikipedia operations at this stage.

Those interested are expected to have following qualities:

  • Experience of more than 500 edits on Sanskrit Wikipedia or more than 4000 global contributions
  • Should be confident in knowledge of correct Sanskrit spellings that is "Shuddha Lekhan" or should know from where he can seek online assistance.
  • A regular participant in discussions.

Vaibhav Jain १५:५३, १८ मेय् २०११ (UTC)

Note=> Above criteria was fixed on 18 May 2011 and next day on 19 May 2011 comment was against above see this, I am confused. -Bhawani Gautam ००:४४, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
Note: This criteria was fixed unilaterally and arbitrarily by Vibhijain, and there is no set criteria to become an admin. I do not know how Vibhijain came to this conclusion, but let me clarify; Theoretically, anyone can become an admin. Rao7Talk ०६:२०, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
Note:It also says that the candidate should be a regular participant in discussions whereas Bhawani Gautam is still new to this wiki and has started participating recently. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ०६:४५, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
No, the question is: On what basis did you decide these criteria? Rao7Talk ०६:५०, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
The older criteria was very outdated. Any change is welcomed. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ०७:०४, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
These criteria are too strict. We don't want people making 500 contributions just to get an admin flag. Rao7Talk ०७:०८, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
This is true. But these are just some basic rules. Th final authority is with the community. The community knows ho is capable of Adminship. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ०७:१४, २२ मेय् २०११ (UTC)
Atleast 1500 edits should be required to nominate yourself as admin, however its a community decision to vote in favour of nomination or oppose it.--Mayur १२:५४, ३ जून् २०११ (UTC)

My request for Permanent Administrator shipसम्पाद्यताम्

Earlier I got only 3-0 support votes due to small community. My adminship is getting over on 27th July. I am placing this request so I can get permanent Adminship.♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ १२:२६, ११ जून् २०११ (UTC)


  • &YSupport, is an active user and can work as an admin. --Eukesh १३:५१, ११ जून् २०११ (UTC)
  •  Y as said by EukeshKrantmlverma (चर्चा) १४:५१, २६ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)


 NStrongly OpposeNo doubt he is an active user but many of his actions as a sysop have been troublesome and reverted by others or by himself upon criticism from others. Moreover, we already have two admins and one more in waiting. Looks like we will have more admins than editors. - रामप्रियः सम्भाषणम् १२:३७, ११ जून् २०११ (UTC)

Closing commentsसम्पाद्यताम्

 N Not done. Well over a month since request was opened, serious concerns about administrative actions raised. Reopen another request if you desire to reapply. Rao7Talk १६:००, २६ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)

Hemant wikikoshसम्पाद्यताम्

प्रियाणि मित्राणि,
अहमत्र प्रबन्धकत्वार्थं निवेदयामि।
Dear friends,
I am hereby applying for adminship on sa.wikipedia.
About Me:
I don’t love to speak about my contributions. But to facilitate our friends in their decision, I’m writing here.
I have been with sa.wikipedia since 26th May 2009. My primary focus at that time had been translating the interface message on this wiki, which were at that time being displayed either in Hindi or grammatically incorrect Sanskrit. This translation work I did on translatewiki.net which is not counted as 'my contribution' on this website. Besides I’ve been keeping eye on newcomers on sa.wiki, and found pleasure having helped them in whatever respect they asked for help. Our respected members can take an idea of my activities from my talk page also (though many times one has to communicate otherwise also). It would not be out of place to mention that I was previously also given offer to take adminship please check here, which I didn't accept because at that time, being too busy in real life I thought that I won't be able to do justice with adminship. Despite being busy in real life, I may humbly tell that I have translaed most of highly used words and phrases of Sanskrit wikipedia. Now I feel that I should work on sa.wikipedia's contents and standardization.
My contributions are here, while my contribution at translatewiki are here.
Please express your vote.
Thanks. धन्यवादाः। -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०५:२६, ८ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)

(Added on 12 July 2011) Just to avert any confusion from dear Vaibhav Jain's succeeding comments on number of edits:
I have more than 700 translation-edits on translatewiki.net in Sanskrit language (there are total 890 or so translated messages at moment I'm writing). My each edit corresponds to one translation and not a play on a single one with multiple edits(as most of number-hegemonists do on wikipedia proper). Further, my all (except some 10 or so) edits correspond to Sanskrit language (this proves that I was working there for sa.wiki only, though this is embarrassing that I have to prove it, but OK - मात्रास्पर्शास्तु कौन्तेय शीतोष्णसुखदुःखदाः।).
This data is as on the date of placing this request for adminship, though my translation work is still continuing at translatewiki.net.
I could very well start a ritual of अष्टोत्तरसहस्रसम्पादनानुष्ठानम् on sa.wikipedia after dear Vaibhav's advice, but I know where should I invest my precious time when, for giving best to sa.wikipedia. I know our respected editors already understand all this. Thanks and Regards. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०६:०३, १२ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)


 YSupport, His previous contributions were valuable and good command on Sanskrit language he is good asset to Sanskrit Language Wikipedia Mahitgar (चर्चा) १२:५४, ९ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
 YSupport, this user has a very good proficiency in Sanskrit, he surely deserve admin right on this Wiki--Mayur (चर्चा) १३:०४, ११ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
 Yसंस्कृतविषयॆ तस्य प्रीतिः, आसक्तिः च अनन्या अस्ति । सः अत्र समीचीनतया कार्यं करिष्यति इति मम विश्वासः अस्ति । Shubha (चर्चा) ०४:३०, १९ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)


  • &NNot nowYou have less than 500 edits on Sa wiki and 922 global contributions. Your work on translate-wiki is appreciable. You have got again active here just now, I advice you to stay here for some more time, and you will definitely get it. Although standardization is a good reason for Adminship, recently many admins are working on it. Through I am happy to see you with sysop rights, you need to stay here for a while, and then reapply. Regards, ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk ०९:००, ८ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
Dear Vaibhav just dont go by number of edits ,I remember he is not only one of the first seriious editor on sanskrit language wikipedia , he had been very pro active and his command on sanskrit language is a very big asset to Sanskrit Wikipedia besides he has done major contribution in translating wikipedia interface at translate wiki in big way and those contributions will not be visible here but were certainly valuable I suggest to take back your opposition Mahitgar (चर्चा) १२:५२, ९ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
Lets see if we can get him edit interface rights, as I am not much comfortable with Administrator. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk १३:१३, ९ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
Please see विकिपीडिया:विचारमण्डपम्#Interface Translator, I don't want to see a user with such a narrow thinking (as it seems with his comment) to be a admin. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk ०६:५४, १० जूलय् २०११ (UTC)


  • Note: I will be closing this request after 14 days instead of the regulation 7 days in order to generate proper consensus. If needed, I will extend it further. In case I forget, please place a note on my talk page, and I will act on it. Thanks, Rao7Talk १५:३६, १० जूलय् २०११ (UTC)

Closing commentsसम्पाद्यताम्

 N I regretfully decline this request, I wish I could approve it. Hemant is a knowledgeable and trusted user, and I have all respect for him. But then, due to stretches of inactivity, and low recent contribs, I am declining it, I'm sorry. Rao7Talk १२:०१, २० सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

This was most discouraging for me. Mr. Mike, you are free to take whatever decision but plz don't cite my inactivity. I know who was active when only me and माहितगार were busy at somehow face-lifting Sanskrit wiki for over a period of 1 year. I was inactive recently because I had some plans which could only be executed after having admin rights and anyway I was continuously working on Hindi wikipedia (though I know these r not counted, because even translatewiki(sanskrit) was discounted). Moreover discriminatory fashion of applying wikipolicies wrt persons is something that hurts. Anyway, Goodbye and Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १८:०३, २० सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
I deeply regret it, there is no second thought about that. I respect you and your contributions greatly, and Sanskrit Wikipedia will forever be indebted to you for that. Rao7Talk १५:४७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
 Y समाप्तम् after further discussion. Rao7Talk १७:२६, २३ नवम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

वैभव जैनसम्पाद्यताम्

अहं संस्कृतविकिपीडिये प्रबंधकउपकरणाय निवेदन करोमि। संस्कृतविकिपीडिये सद्य सक्रियप्रबंधकस्य गणना नीचैः अस्ति, अहं मननं करोमि तत् अहं एषः अन्तर साधाय शक्नोमि।

I request for admin tools on Sanskrit Wikipedia. Recently the active admin count has been low, and I think i can fulfill this. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १४:३३, ६ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)



  1.  NStrong Oppose, I think he requires some more experience for using admin tools, As of now he seems only to collect different flags over different wikis.Also User's actions as a admin has already been suspected and objected by various users.--Mayur (चर्चा) १२:५९, ११ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
With due respect, can you tell how many users objected my actions as a admin other than Harshavs. I know i made some mistakes (not some, many), but i think sa wiki really needs another admin as a lot of maintenance work is left out. Second, please don't bring our personal disputes over here as you did on hi wiki (calling me a vandal) and hi wikt (saying that I am playing with admin tools on move protecting village pump). You are free to oppose but please do that with a clear reason. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १३:१४, ११ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
In hi wiki you removed a vote of another user which is a serious vandalism act that why i said you vandal. You can still do many maintenance work without Admin right.I think there is no need of new admin as of now.if some maintenance work that can be done by admin only then you may ask us to do that,Cheers:-)--Mayur (चर्चा) १३:२७, ११ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
I will refrain from !voting Honestly speaking, the admin actions backlog is nearly empty, and vandalism is not really a big thing here. At the moment, it looks like some or the other admin is nearly always online, and any admin work needing done can be achieved by leaving a note on any one of our talk pages. To be fair to Mayur, he did not bring any previous personal disputes over here in his comment. I give nothing but support and encouragement to Vaibhav, and would like to say in all good faith that its not a big deal. Rao7Talk १४:०५, ११ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

@Mayur By the way that was a mistake, i didn't said that there becoz i don't want to participate in hi wiki discussions anymore. And also i have already talked to Siddhartha on that. If you take a close look there r only 2 active sysops, and 1-2 nonsense is always created in 1 day, and sometimes they stay for 2-3 days. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १५:४२, १३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

My 2 paise, Vibhi as of now you are not experienced as editor and a administrator tools, you shud become a good editor too which will also enhance your admin skills.I think 3(me, mike& bhwani) active admins are enough for sa wiki.Plz drop your habit of searching for flags here and there.You should become a good editor first after that you will be become a reknown wikipedian which we are searching for...Thank you--Mayur (चर्चा) १७:०३, १३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Surprise that after knowing each other too much, you still don't intent to understand me. By the way, i think that other admins r doing a good job. The current serious issue is the MOS of the articles here. Lets try to fix that together. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ०९:४८, १४ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Come on Vibhi, don't take it too seriously; everyone has a bad day, everyone has arguments. Lets just forget all of it shall we. Rao7Talk १८:३९, १४ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Okay Mike. Disputes r going to do nothing for sa wiki, let us try to improve it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १०:०६, १५ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

Closing commentsसम्पाद्यताम्

 N Per concerns raised. Rao7Talk १२:०४, २० सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)

Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा)सम्पाद्यताम्

NOTE: This request for adminship is ending September 29, 2011, 08:26 (UTC)

Hi. I am Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा), and I have been actively volunteering for Wikimedia from April 15, 2011. In my 5 months here, I've amassed experience and knowledge among many other things. I've been into various aspects of Wikipedia maintenance. I fix things relating to syntax on the Main Page of sa.wp, and other pages of commons, and have spent lots of time with AfD and CSD tagging. I'll call myself a WikiGnome. I've made around 8,000 edits on Wikimedia, am a filemover, account creator, and autopatrolled on en.wp, have also had three articles published at Wikinews (where I've also applied for accredited reporter), and am an editor at commons. I've made around 400 edits at sa.wp in my 2 days here, and have created more than 200 articles in my 2 days here, and do plan to create many more soon. I am aware of the admin "backlog" at sa.wp (with pages not being deleted more than 2–3 days after their tagging) and as a sysop, I plan to delete such articles and address the issue of vandalism (even though sa.wp is not at the receiving end of much) among many others. Regarding the question of possible "inactivity" I may go into, I am a Highly Active User on Wiki, and from April 15, 2011, there has not gone one day where I didn't log an edit at Wikimedia. I keep an eye on all four wikis (en.wp, en.wn, commons, and sa.wp) I'm actively involved in, and believe that I can answer (or rather sort) any query regarding admin attention the very day its logged. Regards, Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) ०८:२६, २२ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)


 Y As user have a lot of experience in English Wikipedia, so i think he is eligible to use admin tools in sa wiki however some experience in sa wiki is also necessary.--Mayur (चर्चा) ०६:१८, २५ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
The rollback right of the user was taken on en wiki due to misuse, so i have serious doubts on your statement. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १७:०७, २५ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
[How many times does a user have to repeat himself?] As far as the rollback thing is concerned, that is moot now, and does not affect my editing at sa.wp. Leastwise I was strong enough to remove the rollback icons even though the issue is only moot [unlike you], so I don't think I will have a Mr. Know-it-All [even though you don't know the policies thoroughly, considering you did, any user would see no reason to "Strongly OPPOSE" you quest for permanent adminship. Understanding and taking correct decisions [as an admin] are your Achilles' heel, or so I have been forced to infer] Rather, I have "serious doubt" over you understanding text I post. Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) १७:३६, २५ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)


  • Strong Oppose Many reasons to do that:
    • First, you really seem to know not much about titles used in hinduism articles, and many articles on sawiki are hinduism ones only.
    • Publishisng an articl on wn is not big thing, my two articles were also published, one remained popular till many days, and one was the breaking news.
    • As of article creation, i don't want to speak that, but i can create more articles than you in one day (and of better quality), so at this moment, i think you need much more experience, participate in discussions, try to show some experience in admin areas, u have a long way to go, do some work, and when u think that u r ready, come again with a better, stronger request. Regards, ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १६:४५, २२ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Btw, u created 281, and i 453, that also manually, however very small (but not as ur articles), take it as a advice, no one praises one liners and in fact they r rarely of any use. maybe u r a newbie so u will take time to know that, but one liners are of no use. again take it just as a friendly advice. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १६:५७, २२ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
With all due respect Vaibhav, can I ask what forced you to say: "you really seem to know not much about titles used in hinduism articles"? And by this statement, do I understand that sa.wp is a secular wiki, where only Hinduism articles should stay? And regarding "Btw, u created 281, and i 453, that also manually, however very small (but not as ur articles), take it as a advice, no one praises one liners and in fact they r rarely of any use," I don't know why exactly do we have the {{stub}} template. Oh yes, I just remembered, its because users can create "one liners" and expand them when they grab more info. We all know that sa.wp is suffering from an admin backlog, and my contribution to the whole Wikipedia community speaks for itself. Regarding "Publishisng an articl on wn is not big thing, my two articles were also published, one remained popular till many days, and one was the breaking news." I guess you are not the determiner of what contribution on what wiki is of what value, its your own personal opinion and reflects your utter disregard for the community as a whole. On a personal note, if my request fails, I will be strong enough to digest, unlike you who keeps himself displayed as an admin at sa.wp (misinforming and misguiding users) with your flags on many wikis. And yeah, you're here from IDK when, and have created only 453 articles. I'm already past your half-way mark, and that too in two days. I'll echo your words and say: "take it just as a friendly advice", and remove the incorrect flags you display on many wikis. I'm curious about the two-face you carry, first, you say articles published on en.wn are "not a big thing", challenging the very notability of the community, and then, support the creation of a new wn (hi.wn). You said: "As of article creation, i don't want to speak that, but i can create more articles than you in one day (and of better quality)". OK mate, the [self-declared and self-accepted] challenge is on. And you claim: "no one praises one liners and in fact they r rarely of any use. maybe u r a newbie so u will take time to know that, but one liners are of no use." So you mean that we should be distributing adminship to people only focused on creating articles eventually making it to "प्रमुख लेख"? Oh he's got x featured articles on his belt, lets give him adminship... is that what you're trying to say. If yes, let me remind you that it is just a criteria we use to determine the work and willingness of a user. You also claim that I should get more knowledge of admin related work [and I'm utterly disgraced on being marked a newbie; yeah, you just undermined ALL the work I've done for the community] see this, this and this. I'm sure it'll prove I've got enough, if not immense, "knowledge of of admin related work." Addendum: One, please do answer all my queries to justify you oppose vote; and two, if you think my stubs "are of no use", go ahead, challenge their notability and put 'em up for deletion, then, we'll see what happens (BTW... I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop). Regards, Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) २०:१६, २२ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Okay, first of all, that one liner one was just a suggestion. Second, i never said adminship should b given to one which has a featured article under his belt, but one should show that he is familiar with issues like copyright. Second, i remember ur rollback was taken on en wiki due to misuse, so it puts a question mark on ur maturity. Okay, put my expectations behind, as you know a admin policy is developing in sa wiki in which most people agreed with the requirements, lets examine u on those basis:

More than 500 edits on Sanskrit Wikipedia or more than 4000 global contributions You pass this, but the problem is u have no experience outside en wiki, which is totally different from sa wiki, and ur 499 edits here r nothing for me, as all r creating one liners, u should b happy we don't follow ta wiki policy, i have heard that thy don't keep even 3 liners. second, if u want, i can create 10, 000 articles here in some days, so that doesn't count as experience. Should be confident in knowledge of correct Sanskrit spellings that is "Shuddha Lekhan" or should know from where he can seek online assistance.here u pass A regular participant in discussions.complete fail, i opposed bhawani becoz of the same reason, but after sometime supported as he participated in discussions, but i will again say that u have a long way to go.

as of hinduism articles, sa wiki can also have articles like Kashmir dispute, but if u take a close look, many articles currently here r of hinduism, and what u did on en wiki with the titles, puts a big question mark on ur maturity.

Again, it might look a comment on a GR request, u have no experience on small wikis, many people disagree with me on this, but for me, for Adminship on sa wiki, or even wikis like hi wiki, people should have experience of working in small wikis, however due to this idea of mine, some people also called me a vandal, however that is a different thing. So i think my oppose is justified now.

I'm afraid not. Your oppose ain't as justified as you think it is. First up, can I know who set these criteria? I checked up the page and found out it is a proposed policy [recommended criteria, rather], so please don't quote points and vote on the basis of the proposed policy [I say it should be removed from the page and transferred somewhere else with immediate effect, because content on that page reflects the view of the community not a user, particularly you]. As far as the rollback thing is concerned, that is moot now, and does not affect my editing at sa.wp. Also, we know that sa.wp desperately needs an active admin with the admin backlog still present, and I fit the bill perfectly. Yes, I may have had supported your adminship [which was strongly rejected; and yes, leastwise I was strong enough to remove the rollback icons even though the issue is only moot, so I don't think I will have a person not strong enough to handle rejection to question my "maturity"] if you had not taken the really bad decisions you did and showed regard for WikiPolicies [not proposed ones] particularly HONORIFIC and COMMON NAME. Given your last point, I completely disagree with your "small wiki" point [trust me, no wiki is small, they just might be less known or less read, but that doesn't mean experienced users with SULs knowing the language thoroughly should be disregarded and said to have carried no experience]. Even if I do agree your [hypothetical] small wiki, this'll mean that en.wp is a big/large wiki, and since I carry enough experience there (and also, many policies between the two wikis are common), that does justify that I'll be as knowledgeable, especially as an admin, in this grave time of backlog. If you're challenging the stubs, and are saying that one liners are not useful at all, do start a discussion, and we'll see. As I said, I didn't expect such comments from a [former] sysop as sysops [or even former one's for the matter of the fact] should have a certain knowledge of WikiPolicies, which you don't seem to. And, your oppose [still] ain't as justified as you think it is. Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) ११:२७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
For me, it is, its my vote, so its my wish what requirements i want to set, others may have other expectations. And please keep ur views on small wikis with urself, even stewards use this term, then one day u will point them. To clarify at last, a strong OPPOSE is what is vote on this RfA. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ११:५७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
And i think i have got more knowledge of policies than u, if u had got them, i don't think en wiki admins would had to reject ur request for rollback due to misuse. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ११:५९, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Yeah...so you mean that you vote based on your own reasoning, which are far from logical [considering they were, you would have completely proved your point], I assert. Who started with views on "small" wikis, may I ask? And yes, Mr. Know it All [at least you claim to, as far as policies are concerned], you may think that you have "more knowledge of policies than u", but if you did... maybe you would have become a permanent admin. You don't know the policies thoroughly, considering you did, Mike and Mayur would see no reason to "Strongly OPPOSE" you quest for permanent adminship. You even claimed that Mayur brought in disputes from hi.wp even though half the people agree he didn't. Understanding and taking correct decisions [as an admin] are your Achilles' heel, or so I have been forced to infer. Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) १२:२२, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Addendum: Do remember to indent what you say next time. Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) १२:२२, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
If u want to continue, do that on my talk page, and my oppose will remain a oppose, and by the way, i am not only active on sa wiki, so that doesn't mean that all things related to me here r th only one. at last, my oppose will remain a oppose, and as of mayur case, please don't intrfre if u know nothing about that thing, that dispute was a little personal, so i don't want to discuss it.♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १२:५७, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
I don't want you to support my adminship, I just want you to prove that you [strong] oppose me with a damn good reason, because adminship ain't no joke, and sa.wp really needs one. And on a personal note, you feel really confident about intruding into my "disputes" at en.wp, why do you think someone will not be interested in yours? Remember mate, what goes around, comes around. Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) १३:०५, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
  • प्रबलो विरोधः। प्रायेण मे मतिरासीद् यन्न प्रकाशयेयं स्वमतमिति। परन्तु नीतिसंरचना खलु ध्वस्तैव संस्कृत विकिपीडियायाम् प्रशासनं च कामकारतः एव प्रचलति इति दृश्यते। बहुश्च सम्भावना विद्यते यद् भवान् १:१ "आधिक्यम्" आधृत्यैव प्राबन्धक्यं प्राप्नुयादिति। अतएव अहमत्र स्वमतप्रकाशनार्थम् ईरितोऽस्मि।
अलमत्र किल नीतिज्ञेभ्यः प्रबन्धकेभ्यः नीतेरेव यैः बाधः भवेत्। भवन्तं प्रति न मे किञ्चिदपि द्वेषः, अत्रत्यां च दशां विलोक्य विरोधमतप्रकाशनमपि आवश्यकं भवति। क्षम्यताम् चेत् तापितोऽसि मद्वाक्यैः। -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १७:०१, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Dear Hemant, I would me much obliged if you posted your vote in English, because as of yet, I am still unsuccessful in procuring a proper keyboard for typing Sanskrit, especially in a case where a discussion can go really long (see above). Avenue X at Cicero (चर्चा) १७:१५, २३ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
I will also back up this comment of Avenue, we can provide a English translation, specially in long discussions.♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ०९:३७, २४ सप्तम्बर् २०११ (UTC)


Closing commentsसम्पाद्यताम्

 N. Not done. Not enough support ratio. Would greatly appreciate it if Vibhijain stops hounding users' comments. Just make your point. Rao7Talk १८:०६, १ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

Through i don't thought i hounded somebody's comment, however i shall take care of that in future. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email १०:३७, २ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)

'प्रबन्धिका'पदनिमित्तम् आवेदनम्सम्पाद्यताम्

अहं शुभा, अद्यत्वे संस्कृतभारत्याः संस्कृतविकिपीडियाविभागस्य संयोजिकारूपेण दायित्वं निर्वहन्ती अस्मि । आ वर्षद्वयात् अहम् अस्मिन्नेव कार्ये रता अस्मि । संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाः संवर्धनदृष्ट्या अहं प्रबन्धिकारूपेण कार्यं निर्वोढुम् इच्छामि ।

मम योगदानम् अधः द्रष्टुम् अर्हन्ति -

संस्कृतविकिपीडियाविभागे - https://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D:%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D/Shubha

भवताम् अभिप्रायम् अधः सूचयन्तु इति प्रार्थये । शुभा (चर्चा) १३:११, २ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)


  •  Y संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाः योजकेषु अन्यतमा एषा । अस्याः सक्रियताविषये (संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाम्) न कस्याऽपि अस्ति संशयः । अयं विषयः आनन्दजनकः यत् सा वहुदिनान्तरं प्रवन्धिकापदनिमित्तम् आवेदनं कृतवती ।
अहमत्र तस्याः पदप्राप्तिविषयं सततया समर्थयामि । -सायन्तः (चर्चा) ०७:०२, ४ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y शुभा प्रबन्धिका भवतु इति आशासे । - SumanaKoundinya १२:४७, ७ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y -Sandeep V Kulkarni (चर्चा) १२:४५, ७ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y - samvith (चर्चा) १२:५२, ७ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y समर्थनम् । अनेन विकिपीडियायाः प्रबन्धनकार्यं उत्कृष्टतरं भविष्यतीत्याशासे । -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १३:५१, ८ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y अवश्यं कुतो न | पूर्णमनसा अनुमोदयामि |श्रीगीर्वाणी (चर्चा) १५:०३, ६ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y - Narayanan V T (चर्चा) ०८:५०, ९ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y समर्थनम् --Ganesh Paudel (चर्चा) १०:०१, ९ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Yसंस्कृतविकिपीडियायाः योजकेषु अन्यतमा एषा । अस्याः सक्रियताविषये (संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाम्) न कस्याऽपि अस्ति संशयः --Suryanarayana jois (चर्चा) १०:०१, ९ जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)
  •  Y समर्थनम्--- nivedita2015 (चर्चा) 09:51, १३ दिसम्बर २०१५ (UTC)
  •  Yसमर्थनम् । Komal Prasad Pokharel

काेमलप्रसादः (चर्चा) १५:१७, ४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)




सर्वेभ्यः नमः !
कृपया दृश्यताम् - योजकसम्भाषणम्:Shubha
भवतां सर्वेषां सहकारेण प्रबन्धिकादायित्वं यत् मया प्राप्तमस्ति तन्निमित्तम् अहं कृतज्ञा अस्मि । विकिपीडियायाः संवर्धनाय अहं सर्वविधं प्रयत्नं करिष्यामि इत्येतावत् निवेदयितुम् इच्छामि ।
भवदीया - शुभा (चर्चा) १५:०१, २० जनुवरि २०१४ (UTC)

परियोजना पृष्ठ "प्रबन्धकाः च प्रशासकाः/पुरालेखः २" पर वापस जाएँ